Tag Archive: sedation


Dr Minh Le Cong (RFDS) is possibly the most promiscuous blogshere lecturer out there – he pops up on all the best sites!

After playing the field at Emcrit and LITFL, he is back on Broome Docs this week covering our favourite topic – Psych sedation and retrieval.  This is his presentation to the Australian Aeromedical Society at Burswood in Perth, Western Australia last week.

Minh has sent me the link for the download as it is a big file – too big for this little blog.  So if you need a dose of Minh / ketamine check out his lecture at:

https://rcpt.yousendit.com/1214000281/1d760fcd7988cbbb786f1c799a58272a

It takes a bit to download, but is well worth it.  Then if you haven’t read my recent case on the topic – check it out @ Livin’ the Ketamine dream.  Minh tells me it is the first ketamine-based transfer of psychosis in WA, and might be the shape of the future if you follow Minh’s data from Queensland.

Enjoy

Casey

If you are new to Broome Docs, then you might have missed my mild obsession with Acute Psychiatric Sedation.  (GO back and read the posts from earlier 2011 to get the background and some tricky cases to ponder.)

Last night I had my first opportunity to put Dr Minh Le Cong’s secret weapon (ketamine) into action.  I had a large, schizophrenic patient who was very agitated and due to fly in an hour on the RFDS.  The patient had good going sleep-apnoea, a thick neck, big belly and a history of aspiration pneumonia during a previous sedation-gone-wrong.  This is one of those scenarios where you can make a bad situation worse without trying too hard.  So how did I manage this?

  1. Communication.  Get on the phone and make a plan with the flight crew.  We decided to try and avoid intubation if possible, this patient had a lot of co-morbidities and would not do well with a day or two on the blower.
  2. Team huddle.  Organise your own team, make it clear what the plan is and what plans B, C etc are.
  3. Move to the light => we moved the patient into the Resus area, fully monitoring (including ETCO2) and had the airway gear all ready to go
  4. Sedation.  Titrated sedation is the only way to go.  Give a dose and watch for a bit – chronic Psych patients have a wide range of tolerance to various drugs – so don’t just use a pre-formatted recipe – you have to give a bit and observe response, then repeat. As previously stated – I do not see why a Psych sedation should be done in a low-acuity area, where we would never do procedural sedation for a surgical problem.
  5. Change the plan if plan A is not great.  This patient got quite deep with 4 mg of midazolam and required a nasalpharygeal airway.  So I changed the plan – ketamine.  This worked well – RR went up a bit, patient  was tranquil and allowed us to site another IVC and an IDC with minimal fuss.
  6. Bedside vigil.   You need to be nearby to monitor this patient – you cannot give drugs and wander off to other areas.  I stayed around and actually went with the patient to the airstrip to ensure the plan was working.  Maybe once we are all more familiar with these agents in practice we can relax a bit, but for now I plan to keep my eye on them.

At the end of the night all was well. The patient was sedated, but rousable, moving herself on the stretcher.  Nobody got punched or spat upon.  The RFDS crew seemed happy and her numbers remained perfect throughout.

Here is the gripping conclusion to the Extreme Psych transport that we heard about from Dr Minh in PArt 1 of “A Bridge Over Troubled Waters?”

It is fair to say that Dr Minh and I have similar but slightly differing views on this difficult and hazardous topic.  So here is Minh’s conclusion to the story and his appraoch on the transfer of agitated patients.

As always, Dr Minh’s references and talks are available at the bottom of the blog if you want to know more.  Enjoy – over to Minh….

 

Hi folks. This is the second and final instalment to this case. Where did we leave off? Dilemma? What to do with this involuntary psychiatric patient , intubated in a island hospital without any ICU facilities for the next 8+hours?

There are only two real options. Leave him intubated whilst awaiting retrieval. Or extubate him and observe his behavior whilst awaiting retrieval. It was decided after some discussion to leave him intubated with the GP anaesthetist and nurse in the hospital operating theatre. ALL NIGHT!

Some of my retrieval colleagues have argued that it is riskier to extubate an agitated patient and then try to reintubate again. I admit there is some truth in that but I believe the patient should be given the benefit of the doubt and be allowed a period of observation before embarking on the decision to use intubation and anaesthesia as a form of chemical restraint. The zero tolerance approach to risk in this patient group is inappropriate and violates the legal and ethical principle of least restrictive means that underpins all mental health acts of Australia.

The story gets more complicated. The intubated patient now develops hypotension from presumed sepsis secondary to suspected pulmonary aspiration syndrome. I am not fully aware of all the clinical details that lead to this diagnosis but the patient was commenced on an adrenaline infusion which did correct the hypotension. He was transferred by RFDS the next day but due to more delays not until late in the afternoon. In the end the saga ended the next day after 40 hours of intubation, when the ICU doctor extubated the patient who happily went off to the mental health unit albeit with a sore and hoarse voice having no signs of pulmonary aspiration at all!

Since this unfortunate episode this same patient has been retrieved again in pretty much the same situation. It happened only 3 weeks ago and I spoke to the same treating psychiatrist about how it all went down this time. The difference this time was that we deliberately avoided intubation from the outset as a method of restraint and oral sedation was emphasized at the beginning of the retrieval process. The retrieval team used IV ketamine sedation to good effect and he was happily dropped off to the Cairns Emergency Department as opposed to the ICU!

Primum non nocere, folks!

Dr Minh Le Cong, RFDS Qld

 

Hi All

As a special treat we have a case from Dr Minh Le Cong, my favorite flying doctor.

Minh is superkeen when it comes to all things involving Psych transfer and sedation.  Check out the research and resources he has shared in the links at hte bottom of the Blog.

Anyway, this week Minh has delivered his first installment on the topic – crazily complex logistics of getting a Psych patient out of the Torres Strait to Cairns.

Forget “planes, trains and automobiles” this is more like choppers, ferries and fixed-wings!  Minh describes the logistics of providing a safe “bridge over troubled waters” for these people in remote tropical far-north Queensland.  Proving he is the Art Garfunkel of Psych transfer….

Check out the link below to Minh’s case.  Enjoy, as always – comments welcome.

Casey

Extreme Psych Transfer

The Sedation and transfer of Psych patients is politically tricky.  These situations pit agencies against one another like no other problem.  There is a lot of arguing about safety, resource allocation and who is the boss when it comes to decision-making.  However, we all have the same goals in the end.

Conflict between the treating ground team and the flight team can easily be avoided by using Dr. Minh’s objective measures of arousal, good communication and some inter-agency training – that way we are all speaking the same language and not second guessing one another.  I cannot understate the value of knowing your friendly, local RFDS crew and having a good working relationship based on sound clinical judgement and trust in one another’s skills.

Dr Minh Le Cong from the Queensland RFDS out of Cairns is truly a high flyer when it comes to this topic.  He is doing all sorts of great research on the topic of the safe transport of Psych / agitated patients and has been kind enough to send me a video of a lecture he gave on the topic at the recent World Congress of Aeromedical Retrieval.  I am flabergastered that Dr Minh has the foresight to be doing prospective trials into this stuff, when most of us are lingering in the dark ages, doing the best we can in often bad situations.  He has really taken the bull by the horns and come up with some great material and useful data.

So here is what you should do:

  1. For a case to consider – check out: Case 011 – Psych in extremis
  2. Go back to my post on the topic “Propofol: 1st line in Psychosis” and refresh my approach and my Sedation Matrix
  3. Download the video of Minh’s lecture for yourself.  You can read the references here (In the small world of medical bloggers, the video you see here was actually shot by none other than Dr Cliff Reid – author of the Resus.Me blog for ED / prehospital practitioners out of Sydney.  If you have not seen this – then follow the link and be prepared to have your brain filled with up to the minute evidence for what we all do!)  Big thanks to Cliff for making this possible.
  4. Read my response to Minh’s lecture below.

Minh has shown ketamine is safe and effective and can help avoid intubation in some cases. Great, if can avoid intubation it has to be a good thing!

I’m sure it is a good short-term solution, good for preflight / short flights. However – in the hospital we often are looking at 24 – 48 hours of sedation before the RFDS arrive. So we need an alternative or an infusion?  Flights in WA are routinely 6+ hours, my fear is that the ketamine will wear off about the 3 hour mark – ie. mid-flight, so you would need to use repeated doses?

It might be good for the acute situation where you want to “get control” of a physically aggressive / dangerous patient and don’t want to endanger the airway – however I would advise caution – I would still be doing this in the best area of the hospital in case you do need to establish an airway with some type of plastic. ie. don’t let ketamine’s reputation of being “airway friendly” fool you into doing something in a place where you cannot go to plan B.

In terms of my Sedation Matrix – it might be good for the patients in the middle boxes – where you can try a sedative agent and see if they become a ‘lesser colour’ or need to be escalated.

My feelings on this are based on multiple tricky cases where we have had extremely dangerous patients who required heavy sedation and we could not ensure a protected airway without a definitive ETT. The unfasted, dangerous patient with a history of violence / forensic problems whom needs transfer / cannot be contained in the peripheral hospital. These patients suffer their complications in the heavy sedation pre-transfer, not during intubation / transit in my experience. (Sorry Minh – I will need to get some numbers to support this.)

The role of intubation is to avoid this window of heavy sedation without a definitive airway, and hence avoid the morbidity. I think this is the minority of Psych transfers – ie. those whom we know are dangerous from prior episodes OR those who have failed a decent trail of “safe sedation”. Minh’s service have a very commonsense protocol – follow the link.

This is a true case that occurred in NW WA over a few years and highlights lots of areas of error.  However, I think it is a good “worst case scenario” to illustrate the difficulty we face in sedation in Psychiatric patients here in remote Australia.
We will call the patient Mr Rex, 38 yo Pilbara resident.
•Psych history:
–Diagnosed @ 25 yo with “maniform psychosis”
–Readmitted to Graylands at 26 with amphetamine-induced psychosis.  Dx: bipolar affective disorder
–Managed as outpatient on Olanzapine with variable compliance
Medical History:
–Morbid obesity – wt ~ 150 kg / BMI 52.
–Severe obstructive sleep apneoa, could not afford / tolerate CPAP machine
–Heavy smoker with chronic lung disease / ?asthma
–Heavy Alcohol intake
–Gastro-oesophageal reflux  – untreated
–Hypertension – no treatment
–Intermittent amphetamine use
–No other regular medications
•Social History:
–Living in a small mining town with defacto partner
–Extended family live in SW WA
My first encounter with Mr Rex….
•Arrived @ Karratha ED for  my night shift
–Parking outside = 2x police cars, 1 ambulance, 1 x fire-engine
–Inside – 1 x very large man snoring loudly
– 1 x large police officer with deformed humerus – broken in struggle to remove him from the wagon
–a gang of confused volunteer fire officers, Mr Rex smashed an alarm button in the flurry of wrestling in ED
•Mr Rex was sedated using a combination of midazolam, clonazepam and diazepam by various routes over the first hour in ED
–Admitted under Mental Health Act and RFDS alerted, advised a prolonged time to transport, therefore moved to a ward bed “near nurse’s station”
•Later that night – increasing agitation despite benzos, therefore given a dose of IM haloperidol just prior to nurse handover.
•SMO walked past and noted hypoxia on SpO2 monitor, then cardiac pause – precordial thump, then CPR
•Called duty Anaesthetist – Mr Rex “surprisingly easily” intubated but had clearly aspirated.
•RFDS alerted – flew to Royal Perth ICU overnight
•30 day admission – slow to wean off ventilator, required tracheostomy
•Discharged to Graylands (Psych hospital in Perth)
•Returned to Pilbara on CTO.
The following are excerpts from a letter to the Pilbara Hospital from the RFDS following this transport.
Please be aware that the patient poses a significant transport problem and should probably not be transported by RFDS by air for acute mental health problems (unless he has arrested or been intubated for medical problems.) Any transport attempt will result in a dilemma of either excellent sedation with Olanzapine and midazolam resulting in no airway OR no sedation, a good airway but a combative large individual.

•Discussion with specialist anaesthetists and Chief Psychiatrist came to the conclusion that it was inappropriate to consider intubation for air transport and that he posed too great a risk to fly unsedated or sedated but unintubated.

So about a month after discharge…
•Mr. Rex went on another amphetamine bender resulting in psychosis:
•Symptoms: increasing insomnia, pouring drinks on his head, urinating in the house, dropping lit cigarettes indoors, stealing money from friends, walking around front yard naked, using chainsaw to threaten neighbours, set fire to fence and pouring petrol over his head at service station.
•Not complying with his CTO / medications
•Decision was taken to transport Mr Rex, by road to Perth, 1600 km over 18 hours…
–2 Police officers in a “paddy wagon”
–1 nurse
–3 stages – in 3 days
–Staying in similar regional hospitals en route
–Arrived at Graylands safely
Was this a success?
–Least restrictive?
–Best use of resources?
–Safe?
So now skip forward 2 years…
Mr Rex was ‘on holidays’ in Broome, Police called to McDs where he was creating a scene at 04:00
Told Police he had torched his car outside of town and walked into Broome
•No shoes or shirt.  Taken to the local ED by Police
•Advised ED staff he had been in Graylands and had sleep apnoea
•Pressured speech, pacing in ED, attempted to approach another unconscious patient
•Police assisted in getting him back to his bed and had IV sited, threatened with Taser
•Placed under the Mental Health Act – for transport etc
Info sought from Pilbara Hospital, the following info was faxed : “allergic to Haloperidol” “Laryngeal spasm”
•Given IV midazolam + 20 mg oral olanzapine
•Settled and was monitored 2:1 nurse
•Continuous oximetry showed variable low 90’s readings, though he responded to verbal stimulation
•Took deep breaths to command
•At 06:55 – 3 mg IV midazolam
•DMO also ordered IV esomeprazole for aspiration risk
•Nurses noted him to be cyanotic at 07:05, Unresponsive – CPR commenced, adrenaline etc
•30 mins of bag-mask / LMA ventilation – unsucessful, declared dead.
Duty Anaesthetic DMO arrived as he was eventually called – noted he had a Grade 1 laryngeal view
Now this case is clearly tragic – an extremely sad mix of medical errors.  I put it up so that we can see the “worst case scenario” and contemplate how we would all deal with such a challenging situation.  I hope to generate a bit of debate.
Coming soon a post which I hope will answer some of the questions posed by Mr Rex… comments please!

This is my first “Ask the Expert” section  - where I ask the smartest people I know about a topic that I find tricky.

My guest this post is Dr Stephen Ford, Consultant Psychiatrist, and keen worm-farmer.  Steve gets very excited about neural pathways and lesions in old people.  And don’t get him started on exotic neurotransmitters….  anyway I thought I would ask him a few garden-variety questions and see where I have been going wrong when it comes to assessing and managing the confused old person.

Collateral history about the timing of the onset of the confusion is the single most valuable piece of information in differentiating delirium from dementia. In individuals with pre- existing dementia, who are also at higher risk for delirium, establishing what constitutes a change from normal from an informant can be challenging.

At interview the presence of impaired attention is a useful sign. Attention has multiple components including attention to stimulus, maintenance of attention and shifting focus appropriately. At the bedside it is usefully tested by observation and the ability to name the months of the year / days of the week in reverse chronological order. Attentional deficits are usually mild in early dementia but much more prominent in delirium.

The presence of new onset visual hallucinations is more consistent with delirium though visual hallucinations do occur in dementia. Often these are accompanied by illusions and delusions and have a dream-like quality in delirious states.

Disorientation to place and the passage of time is prominent in both conditions. A trap is the patient who is reported to have had a disturbed night presenting in an oriented manner on the morning ward round (after reorientation by morning staff). Given the fluctuations in the condition people with a delirium are generally worse over the day than they appear first thing in the morning.

Something like a quarter of deliriums have their origin solely in pharmacological iatrogenesis. You are quite right to highlight anticholinergic medications (ie oxybutyinin, amitriptyline) as prime suspects given the importance of impaired acetyl choline neurotransmission in the pathway to delirium.

What’s less known is that many classes of medication have anticholinergic activity that may be significant in already compromised individuals (digoxin, warfarin, frusemide, H2 antagonists as per Tune et al Anticholinergic Effects of Drugs Commonly Prescribed for the Elderly.  In general suspect any new medications that precede the onset of new confusion. Particular suspects include opioids, benzodiazepines, antihistamines and oral steroids. Dopaminergic medications in those with Parkinson’s disease are a common cause as is elevated lithium levels in those with chronic mood disorders. Drug interactions can frequently precipitate delirium. An under recognised interaction is synthetic opioids with serotonergic medications leading to a serotonergic syndrome (ie tramadol, pethidine [norpethidine is an anticholinergic metabolite], fentanyl or methadone with antidepressants). Buprenorphine and oxycodone are generally safe with antidepressants though may cause confusion in their own right. Beta blockers have been reported to cause delirium though I haven’t seen a clear case myself. Though not strictly medication side effects – alcohol and benzodiazepine withdrawal can be an easily missed cause of confusion in a hospital environment. A summary of the imperfect evidence for particular drug classes is here

High yield investigations would be a urea & electrolytes, full blood picture and urinalysis, though a broader screen is generally performed. Delirium is ultimately a clinical diagnosis based on the findings of the classic features. Generally a cause is evident but not always so trust your clinical findings over your potentially normal investigation results. Simple things to re-check include the drug chart, history of constipation and the possibility of withdrawal. Repeat the physical looking for focal neurological features. Be careful not to mistake a receptive aphasia for confusion. Its worth bearing in mind that in those with pre- existing cognitive impairment, recovery from a delirium may be prolonged even after the cause has resolved. If all else fails then further investigation of the rare will be needed and sometimes our only option is “the use of time as a diagnostic tool” ie waiting for the process to declare itself.

Management must be directed at the underlying cause of the delirium. This should include gentle reorientation, asking family to accompany the patient and use of a night light. The cycle of nocturnal agitation followed by sedation and then daytime somnolence leading to night time agitation is a troublesome one and can only be managed by avoiding sedation and keeping the patient awake by day. Sedation only has a role in preventing harm by virtue of a patient’s agitation (falls, aggression or absconding).

Antipsychotics are the least harmful but do carry risks of oversedation, parkinsonism and falls. The 2007 Cochrane review failed to show a difference in efficacy between haloperidol (doses of < 3mg) and atypical antipsychotics in managing delirium. There is some support for antipsychotics shortening the duration of postop delirium but a study with olanzapine and an orthopaedic population found the opposite so the jury is still out. In patients with marked persecutory delusions from their delirium then an antipsychotic may relieve distress. Some preclinical studies suggest atypical antipsychotics may be better at increasing cortical acetyl-choline than haloperidol but this is not well established clinically. I tend to use risperidone as it is cheap, comes in multiple forms and has a reasonable onset and duration of action. The main problem is the alpha blockade and postural hypotension. Doses should be much lower in the elderly than those used for patients with schizophrenia. If injection is required haloperidol is suitable with the main risk that of Qtc prolongation. There is an FDA black box warning about the use of injectable olanzapine and injections of benzodiazapines that dissuades me from using them together. Those with Parkinson’s disease should have dopamine agonists (pramipexole, cabergoline) stopped before entacapone stopped before L-Dopa. Obviously antipsychotics are relatively contraindicated – quetiapine is the least likely to worsen the Parkinson’s disease with doses generally in the 12.5-25 mg range (mean daily dose for psychosis in Parkinson’s disease is 75mg). Haloperidol absolutely should not be given in this population. If aggression is extreme benzodiazepines are the acute sedation of choice in this group.

OK, now that I have got your attention with a controversial headline lets discuss the real topic – safe sedation and management of acutely unwell psychiatric patients.  This is a hugely difficult scenario for many remote hospitals, which are not ‘Authorized’ Mental Health institutions, and are therefore required to transport patients to tertiary Psych hospitals for evaluation and management.  The sedation and transfer of patients admitted under the Mental Health Act is a minefield of disasters and sentinel events / coronial enquiries.

There has been a lot of paper spent in the various agencies on trying to resolve this dilemma, however the incidents keep happening.  Most efforts have been aimed at coming up with Sedation Protocols, however as a frontline worker I find it difficult to apply a single approach to all patients.  So after a lot of pondering and trial-and-error I have come up with my own approach – it is completely without evidence (other than my limited case series) and based on a lot of common-sense pharmacology and local logistical knowledge.

My hospital has one big ward – Geris, babies, surgical patients and usually 1 or 2 mental health inpatients – often 1 on sedation of some form or another.  There are no locked doors, security guards or even many trained Mental Health nurses.  This is far from ideal, but is the reality in most rural towns in Australia.

The basis of my “Safe Sedation Protocol” is a ‘matrix’ which combines both an assessment of the patient’s current risk – to self and others (Q: how dangerous is this patient?)  along with an assessment of their ‘anaesthetic risk’ (Q: How safe is it to sedate this patient?)  - including the airway assessment, medical risk, likelihood to tolerate prolonged sedation or intubation.

What am I trying to achieve with this approach?

  1. Avoid the morbidity associated with prolonged sedation (sometimes 2 – 3 days awaiting transfer).  This morbidity almost exclusively occurs in the patient after admission / sedation whilst awaiting transfer – NOT in transit.
  2. Avoid injury to the staff and the patient – high rate of staff injury makes it tough to retain good nurses
  3. Prevent the deaths which still occur – these are entirely preventable and iatrogenic.
  4. Maybe even save some $/resources???  Just my guess, no data to support this claim…
  5. Put sedation in Psych on an even footing with other sedation.  No longer should we be sedating these people in darkened corners of the hospital, far from appropriate monitoring, with a single “nurse special” in attendance.  Seems obvious but we keep doing it!
  6. Adhere to the “least invasive, least restrictive” principles of the Mental Health Act

Anyway this post is getting too long – so follow the links below if you are interested and let me know what you think:

SAFE Sedation Matrix:  Try and assess the risk and assign a “colour” to your patient – kinda like the NZ cardiovascular risk tool, eh bro! Print this out so you can follow the colour guide below (or tab back and forth if you know what I mean)

Sedate-by-colour  guide: I realise there is a lot of grey between the colours, but this is a “guide” only – designed to make you think twice before jumping into a possible disaster!  Patients are often in a state of flux – so be prepared to up or – down- grade them a colour if the situation changes.  In fact some of the sedation you use will hopefully move them into a cooler, more happy colour group (ie. you are more happy, not necessarily them!)

Sedative Agents - what I use and why.  It is a poor man’s pharmacy, but I like to keep it simple!  Currently being formulated…