Archive for May, 2012


Mother of a 15 month old boy (weighs 11 kg) presents to the clinic with a bottle of massage liniment.

 

A quick glance at the label tells you the active ingredients are;

 

Per 50 milliliter:

 

 

Mum says she just popped out to hang the washing and left him playing on the floor.  She was not aware that her teenage son had left the bottle on the couch after going to footy practice.

 

When she came back inside she immediately smelled the menthol and found the little guy on the floor, playing with the bottle, it was dripping down his chin and he was making a disgusted face – like he had a bad taste in his mouth.  She picked him up and could smell the scent on his breath.  But he was fine, happy and she gave hi a bottle of milk to settle him and get the taste out of his mouth.
Ok, now you are seeing him 45 minutes later – he still looks fine, he is playing happily, smells like a gymnasium.  His obs are all normal and Mum says:
“I am sure it is fine – but I just thought I should bring him in for a quick once over…”
After examining him you agree that he is normal, no signs of respiratory distress, no chest or abdo signs.  Now here are the questions:
Q1:  What is likelihood that a toddler would have swallowed more than a few mils?
Q2: Which of the ingredients are potentially toxic? And how much would be required for potential serious badness?
Q3:  What signs, symptoms and timeframe will you want to keep an eye on this little boy?
Q4:  What resources can you use to help make this assessment and formulate a management plan?


Dr Minh Le Cong has finally found his own home and settled down with a nice new blog called Prehospital and retrieval medicine PHARM.

This is a high quality blog looking at all things to do with transfer and prehospital care of the sick patients in remote parts of Australia.

Minh is mildly obsessed with all things airway, psychiatry and critical care.  My type of guy!

If you are interested in this stuff then go to the site prehospitalmed.com

FYI there is a discussion podcast between Minh, myself and Dr Tim of the KI-Docs blog about all things to do with remote care, education and training.

Check it out.

Casey

OK.  This is just plain out there.  We see some unusual stuff in the remote areas – things you only read about in the books!  I am going to put this in the category of medical voyeurism.  This is not how we should go about our business, but I had to share these pics!

20 yo with pleuritic chest pain, not much else, but hypertensive BP =  160/90 [not that unusual up here in the tropics]

He managed to get a D-dimer… and then the inevitable CT angiogram  (probably PERC negative)

Here is a slice from the CT -

OK – spot diagnosis, what is going on?

Today’s case is not in the ED.  This one unfolds on the ward – the morning after the admission.  So imagine yourself there – on the Paeds surgical ward.

6 year old boy was admitted last evening after referral from the local GP to the on-call Surg team.

He has a 24 hour history of increasing central abdominal pain.  The pain wa initially periumbilical, but overnight it has localized to the lower abdomen – maybe a bit more on the right. Urinalysis was normal

The surgical team have been on their super-early orning rounds and seen the child – they have written in the notes:

tender lower abdo, no rebound, guarding, otherwise soft, afebrile.  Bloods all normal.  PLAN:  Med team consult please.? epurients

OK, now that is Surg -speak for – we aren’t operating on this kid – not a likely appendix.  Turf to med, maybe its constipation?

Half way though your ward round the nurse- coordinator calls you to say:  “You had better come see this kid – he has just had a bout of melena

Hmmmm… not sounding like your average “un-appendix”.  So you pop in and see him.  Mum is looking worried.  His obs are normal, his belly is ‘as described’ by the Surg team.  When you pull down his jocks for a gander at his bottom you notice his scrotum is a bit red, and on examination his left testis is tender and there is a definite hydrocoele.  Hmmmmm…

OK – can you solve this Paediatric puzzle?

What is going on?  Well here is the clincher.

Rash

What are you going to do next?

Congrats to Dr Bek – who as it turns out practices about 500m down the road from me at the local Aboriginal Medical Service.  Bek gave the right and most insightful answer.  Good call from Maj and Patrick also – honorable commendations.  I happen to know Bek was at a recent talk I gave which covered HSP – so technically she did cheat? But I think she already knew before I got to her!

HSP (Henoch-Shonlein purpura) is an IgA-mediated leukocyoclastic vasculitis which produces a syndrome in children as described by the eponymous gents (and Heberden 30 years earlier). They described the quadrad of: purpura, arthralgia, abdominal pain and melena. Of course, they missed the meat – the renal disease. The disease involves a vasculitis of small vessels in the skin, gut, joints, glomeruli etc. It is pretty much the same disease as IgA nephropahy (Berger’s disease) in adults. HSP ends to occur in young children 4 – 10

I love HSP as a diagnosis as it is one of those end-of-the-bed diagnoses which can present in a number of ways – a rash, joint pain, belly aches etc. You have to keep it in you thoughts or you might miss it. The diagnosis is basically clinical – unless it is unclear as to the cause of the rash – so you might check for other causes of purpura. As opposed to ITP etc the platelets will be normal or elevated.

Treatment is mainly symptomatic – analgesia and “surgical” management of complications such as intussusception or torsion. GI bleeding, abdo pain and joint pain are usually treated with oral steroids. Does it work?  Well – maybe.  There are papers in both direction but they are all small and lack the power to say yes or no.  A rough summary is that they might make you belly pain get better sooner,  make the likelihood of an operation or CT scan lower and just might improve joint symptoms.  Now onto the million dollar question… the beans.

The reason HSP is an important problem in the long term is that there is an incidence of chronic renal disease. Usually a nephritic syndrome (though some mixed or nephrotic). And some of these kids will progress to renal failure. Here is the problem – there are studies that show that early steroids, and even cyclophosphamide do not reduce this progression. So we cannot treat the serious complication.

Monitoring includes urinalysis testing, BP monitoring – as there is about a 7% recurrence rate and the risk of renal disease goes up with recurrence and older-age of the kid.

 

I have had a few readers ask questions about the use of ultrasound for the difficult epidural – usually in the labour ward context, but we sometimes run into this in the OT for combined spinal-epidural blocks.  Now I  love all things ultrasound – but looking at the literature it is tough to get a read on the utility of US in the often troublesome area of epidurals.  All those bones – can we see anything useful?  So I have asked an expert, and gotten a few handy, practical pointers.

Dr Chris Mitchell is a Consultant Anaesthestist at King Edward  Memorial Hospital for Women in Perth, Western Australia. But Mitch is more than an Anaesthetist – before he went into specialist training Chris was a rural GP-Anaesthetist in NW WA.  In fact my first job after my training in Anaesthesia I actually replaced Chris!

Now onto the meat of the post – here are Chris’s tips in beautifully illustrated form – click here [US for Epidurals]

I think it should be said – epidurals in the labour ward are an elective procedure.  There is a risk : benefit pay off.  If you are increasing the risk side of the equation as a result of a difficult insertion, then you need to discuss that with the patient – so before calling for he US machine I think it is worth a pause to consider if this is worth a try – I am sure that for the occasional operator this technique wil help, but is no magic bullet!

We usually try and avoid the patients with really tough anatomy – if the BMI is over 35 we usually start to strongly consider referral to a larger institution for a whole raft of safety reasons.

Huge thanks to Dr Mitch for his pearls on epidurals and US.  I would love to hear your experiences and if you have any questions for Chris I will pass them along.  Comments please

Casey

 

This week’s case is “chest pain” in a relatively young man.

I am going to make it tricky by giving you info bit by bit – see if you smart buggers can work it out.

Step 1 – here is the initial ECG.  2 hours of central chest pain.  What is happening?  what are you going to do?

Does he meet criteria for thrombolysis?

OK – so you all seem to agree he has pericarditis on the ECG.  And the history was convincing – 23 yo, pleuritic left chest pain, radiating to the left arm.  He had a story of an acute “strept throat” and was just finished a week of oral penicillin.  BUT – the initial tropT was 0.88, and in the morning it was up to 16!  So he clearly has more than a simple pericarditis.

Just to be sure, late at night I did a bedside ECHO to check if he had anything suspicious.  This showed a small pericardial effusion and no “eyeball” evidence of regional (inferior) wall motion abnormality (for what it is worth with me – an ECHO gumby looking with my eyeballs!)

So lets say he has a myopericarditis.  Let us now look at the treatment.  How do you manage this?  And if you are super-smart – are there any other causes to consider other than “viral”?

If you are unaware of Dr Smith’s ECG blog then check out the section on pericarditis here - lots of pearls for telling MI from pericaritis.

Let me know on he comments.

When I was an intern in a big old hospital one of the tasks we did was taking blood cultures off of patients who spiked fevers on the wards.  In fact thinking back on it, I think I was taking cultures to appease the senior ward nurses and not really stopping to think about the why?  Probably stabbed any number of patients with early sepsis and happily continued onto the next job without even worrying about the BP, lactate, line sepsis etc etc…  It was an annoying task as it was “time critical” – you had to get the cultures ASAP as the fever spiked – or else the boss would be grumpy, we might “miss the sepsis”.

Were we right to worry about getting the cultures done in a timely fashion?  Did it have to be “during the rigors?”

My colleague pointed out this paper by Riedel et al, Journ Clinical MIcro (April 2008).  This case-review looked at 1436 patients and their fever – culture timing profile and found that it really didn’t matter when you took the cultures in realtion to the spike of a fever – the majority of positive came from cultures taken hours after a fever.  This study cannot comment on the numbers of “missed” bacteremias as a result of wrong / delayed timing.

So what does it all mean for you, next time the nurse calls to tell you Mr Jones has spiked a temp….

  1. Walk, don’t run – it really doesn’t matter if you do it now or in an hour.
  2. Go there, look at the patient and think “what is going on here?”  Does he have a reason to be febrile already documented, on appropriate therapy?  Or, is he someone who needs to be reassessed for sepsis – does he have a line infection?  Does he have a wound infection?  Is he in SIRS or worse?  Do you need other sites cultured – urine, chest etc?
  3. Take cultures as clean as possible – aseptic approach – try and avoid those frustrating false positive BCs
  4. Contemplate changing the plan – look at the AB cover – is is sensible? Do you need to yank a line or call a surgeon to drain some pus?

Thanks Ben for the article.  Interns – relax, but do a more thorough job!    Casey